Marilyn Frye on opression, racism and sexism Essay

Marilyn Frye on opression, racism and sexism - Essay ExampleFrye defines burdensomeness by including cultural and stinting structures, which according to her are the reasons why dominators and subordinates exist. She describes oppression by trying to explain the thought that the society itself builds up the root word of sex marking, sex announcing or for the most part sex identification that according to her must have created advantages among men but disadvantages among women. This according to her has become the root cause of oppression which she strongly defines as, A organization of interrelated barriers and forces which reduce, immobilize and mold people who belong to a certain group, and effect their subordination to another group (individually to individuals of the oher group, and as a group, to that group). Based on this definition, she tries to explicate the loony toons that for as long as women could be generally defined as subordinates and men as dominators, oppression would take place against the former. The prompt of what is masculinity and feminity has something to do with the existence of this oppression as Frye argues that as our cultural system tries to train us to behave differently as men and women, innate dimorphism has become a very obvious outcome (p.239). This according to her has always placed men on the advantage side as they could take function over women. The idea of Frye concerning oppression seems to originate in the cultural foundation and so she tries to conclude that either masculinity or feminity is just a biologic transformation that culture inculcates us, which according to her could be changeable the moment we are able to understand how the the things operate and go around us (p.240). She tries to argue this point based on her experience and as a feminist trying to correct the elemental principle linked up with how the fundamental cultural desktop of every individual could contribute to the prevailing oppression again st women, particularly on the ground of sex identification. Clearly, Fryes discussion on the ways in which oppression operated in society, and the effects it has on both women and men in the case of sexism have to be evaluated, but prior to that it is important to know how she defines sexism. According to her, sexism could carry the forces which make us mark and announce sexes are among the forces which constitute the expression of women, and they are central and essential to the maintenance of that system (p.238). As stated earlier, Frye opposes the idea of domination and subordination and eventually sex identification, as for her these could potentially build the essential foundation of oppression against women. She is trying to look at the negative subtraction of oppression in this case and is more closely concerned on the welfare of the women who are strongly defined as the subordinates to mens dominition. On the ground that oppression would lead to overall negative consequenc es, from the consequentialist point of view, Fryes idea of oppression would remarkably make sense (p.233). This means that if mens dominition would lead to negative impacts against women, thusly the associated oppression is the end itself to justify the presence of male dominance and eventually domination against women. However, if in the case that dominition by itself, which would concede men to dominate over women is a primary form of a natural, cultural or biological design of putting the society in order, then there must no associated negative connotation of feminity or masculinity. They would just elaborate the appropriate role that